Johannesburg High Court Mandates Shared Parental Leave

Afaf Fahchouch
Afaf Fahchouch
2 Min Read
Johannesburg High Court Mandates Shared Parental Leave

The High Court in Johannesburg has shattered traditional norms surrounding parental leave. The ruling, which came in response to a challenge to South Africa’s labor laws initiated by a couple from Limpopo, signifies a pivotal moment in the fight for gender equality.

The case was launched by the Limpopo couple last year, contesting the discriminatory nature of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act. Until now, this legislation offered mothers four months of maternity leave while fathers were only entitled to ten days off after the birth of a child.

Deputy Judge President Roland Sutherland of Gauteng delivered the transformative judgment, addressing the longstanding gender bias within the labor laws. He contended that the act’s failure to provide fathers an equal opportunity to share the bonding experience with their newborns constituted “unfair discrimination.” Additionally, Judge Sutherland argued that it was inappropriate for the legislature to dictate that mothers must assume the role of primary caregivers.

The discrimination also extended to parents whose children were born through surrogacy or adoption, according to the ruling.

Parliament now has a two-year deadline to revise the legislation to align with the court’s decision. In the meantime, a temporary arrangement has been put in place, granting “all parents, regardless of their circumstances,” four consecutive months of parental leave.

It’s important to note that the ruling’s ultimate confirmation will be contingent on the Constitutional Court. Nonetheless, this judgment signifies a significant step toward dismantling entrenched gender disparities in parental leave policies.


Share this Article
Leave a comment